🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.