🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.